Open Source and proprietary platforms, both deliver great results while
developing solutions. At
MRCC, we are focused on making an optimal choice to suit the needs of our
clients. With over 20 years in the industry, MRCC has the depth and extent of
experience to understand specific organisational needs in terms of what the clients need the solution to do, what
attributes it should have and how it can fit into the rest of their
infrastructure and walk them through options for choosing the right platform. We
have worked extensively with both proprietary as well as open source platforms
and hence picking a favourite ideology is
not what we are here for.
However, many of today’s latest
enterprise technologies are centered around
open source platforms. There are certainly clear indicators that point to why
open source platforms are chosen by top organizations that include government
organizations, several major banks,some of the largest technology
multinationals and even leading retailers and fast-food chains world over. In
the contention between proprietary and open source, both have its ardent
supporters, but open source steadily seems to be standing its ground.
One of the main reasons for choosing
an open source platform is the flexibility it offers. Notwithstanding the lower
cost that stands as its major selling point, Open Source platforms offer their
customers the ability to change the platform to meet their changing needs, and
the ability to change the provider down the line, if they are looking for
better service. There’s a good possibility that a client’s requirements of a
learning management system may vary a few years after implementing it.
To further understand this inclination
among users to Open Source LMSs, we have listed down various elements of both the
platforms to come in handy while you choose
the LMS you want to implement:
|
Feature
|
Open Source LMS
|
Proprietary LMS
|
|
Ownership
|
You
always own your data and your LMS code
|
Only the company owning the LMS can
support it
|
|
Licensing
|
Zero licensing cost
|
Initial licensing fee and regular
renewals
|
|
Cost
|
Low - includes basic development and
maintenance cost
|
High – high licensing and
maintenance costs
|
|
Flexibility
|
High – the open source code allows
users to add features and applications that are not already available
|
Not very flexible
|
|
Security
|
Source code access and large user
base of global developers helps in
fixing security glitches promptly
|
Security patches
are provided by the vendor
|
|
Support
|
Large global community of open
source users provide support
|
Support is provided
by the vendor
|
|
Vendor
Lock-in
|
If you want a different company to
support you, your options are open
|
You are
locked into the provider as well as the solution
|
|
Scalability
|
Easy to scale through source code
modification
|
Maybe a problem depending on internal
architecture
|
|
Hosting
|
Can be hosted anywhere
|
Mostly hosted by the vendor
|
|
User
Experience
|
Can be largely modified to ensure
customer satisfaction
|
Customized to meet user requirements
and expectations
|
So, which LMS are you planning to implement for your organisation’s training needs next?
Let us know your thoughts at info@mrccsolutions.com.

No comments:
Post a Comment